I am still hugely miffed about how this entire situation has played out. I would like to provide my point of view so that hopefully this type of situation can be avoided in the future. I would love to know if others share this sentiment.
*Disclaimer, yes, I understand new revisions are needed, but how it has been handled has been extremely poorly. I wish to explain/vent.
Remote 2 backers are promised “a little something”, and I guess at least that’s not hyperbole. Being forced to buy the new hardware for €279 in order to even take advantage of our loyalty is one thing. To see our loyalty is worth €20 is another. For one, an offer of a free dock 3 (or significantly discounted) and IR improved blaster, without having to buy another remote, would go way further. It seems like version 3 of the dock and upgraded blaster includes some essential improvements that were sorely lacking in version 2 (weak IR, dock is signal source AND only charging station, etc.). Being upsold just feels… icky. Maybe it’s just me though?
Anyways… what amazes me though is that isn’t even enough to really dissuade me from giving you more money for a new product, because I believe in the mission and the remote 2 hardware is extremely nice, even if I can’t use it. But therein lies the main issue. The reason I cannot persuade myself into giving more money:
I still cannot use my remote 2, at all.
There has been no communication that I’m aware of on here or Discord about timelines on IP control of LG TVs or Onkyo/Pioneer AVRs. LG isn’t some obscure manufacturer. I would be shocked if they weren’t in the top 3. As for Onkyo/Pioneer, there’s got to be some demand for these manufacturers as well. I see discussions of user integrations being released sometime in the future, but nothing regarding that specific hardware being compatible. (Let alone my other gear, minus my Apple TVs.)
And yes, I know about HomeAssistant for controls, but when we bought into the Kickstarter, I don’t remember, “forced usage of HA in order to have an operating universal remote” being in the promotional materials. Maybe I missed it. I have not chosen HA hardware yet, so I would really prefer my remote be able to handle remote duties sooner than it takes me to get a new smart home system set up and everything transferred over.
If we had been delivered a fully working remote 2, these points would be moot. Release your new hardware, try to make money, give loyal customers a little something extra (in addition to a working product), keep going, rinse and repeat. I get it.
But our “reward” for spending €350+ years ago (if I’m remembering correctly) is to be able to spend another €279+, on a second device? I would then have two devices that still don’t have a concrete timeline for when they will be working without me relying on HA for integral universal remote functionality. I want to do it, but I logically can’t.
Sorry for the wall of text. I feel a little better, but maybe I’m factually wrong somewhere or just wrong with how I’m feeling.